Training webcasts for early career researchers. Available topics:
•The "How to Get Published" series: 3 webcasts with advice on preparing your manuscript, structuring your article and using proper manuscript language. Each webcast lasts up to 10 minutes.
•The "How to Review a Manuscript" series: 3 webcasts on the peer review process, how to review a manuscript and what criteria a reviewer uses. Each webcast lasts up to 13 minutes.
•The "Introduction to Scholarly Publishing" series: 2 webcasts about the role of publishers, contributions to science & health communities, and stages in the journal publishing cycle. Each webcast lasts up to 10 minutes.
•The Impact Factor and Other Bibliometric Indicators: discover more about the range of indicators available and how they are used to gauge journal and article impact.
Hannah Foreman, Elsevier, on behalf of Aleksandr Noy, Senior Research Scientist, Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryRecorded: Jul 25 201322 mins
The goal of this presentation is to provide some background information on how to write successfully in order to obtain a funding grant for your research. Grantsmanship is a skill that everyone learns throughout their research careers and we have to say upfront that there are no sure-fire recipes for success in this business. However, some of the tips that we provide in this presentation should help you to avoid some common pitfalls and also organize your writing process a little better.
This webcast is all about making sure that your publication gets the attention it deserves. We’ll give some tips and trick that can help you as an author, and we’ll also explain what we as a publisher are doing to help.
Laura Schmidt, ElsevierRecorded: Jan 17 20136 mins
Tips for Authors including: using proper manuscript language so editors and reviewers can understand your messages, best use of English grammar and where to find help with language editing or translation.
Tips for Reviewers including: issues to review, presentation of the paper, how to write comments to Editors and authors, what oversight a reviewer provides, the review process in steps, and what criteria a reviewer needs for assessment.