Morningstar invites you to discuss counterparty risk in ETPs:
- What are the sources of counterparty risk in ETPs?
- How are investors being protected from this risk?
- How are they being compensated for assuming this risk?
- How is the industry addressing concerns over these risks?
- What more can be done to further illuminate and mitigate this risk?
As jurisdictions continue to move forward with strategies for resolving large banking organisations, recent turmoil in relation to European bank stocks has raised questions as to how markets will react to the initiatives and perceived differences between them. This webinar will take stock of comparative bank resolution regimes and the stated strategies of the resolution authorities under those regimes. We will also look at ‘pre-emptive’ measures such as structural changes and changes to the terms of bank instruments. From a market point of view, we will also discuss the effect that the above factors, the possibility of bail-in, and the need to raise TLAC/MREL/PLAC, will affect the market for bank capital and debt instruments as well as other banking transactions.
Oliver Ireland, Morrison & Foerster
Jeremy Jennings-Mares, Morrison & Foerster
Doncho Donchev, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
Tom Young, IFLR
2017 AWARD WINNER: The Government Liquidity Fund won the Fixed Income Innovation of the Year award from Professional Pensions UK. This unique money market fund offers cash investors gilt security, daily liquidity and a yield comparable to prime money market funds. One of its key features is that it faces non-bank counterparties allowing treasurers to diversify their cash away from bank risk. For more information visit, governmentliquidityfund.comRead more >
Matthew Thomas, Asia Bureau Chief, Euromoney Institutional Investor
- Margaret Harwood-Jones, Global Head of Securities Services, Standard Chartered
- Cheri F. McGuire, Group Chief Information Security Officer, Standard Chartered
- Patrick Wheeler, Director, Cyberwayfinder
- Paul Jackson, Head of Asia-Pacific Cyber Security & Investigations Practice, Kroll
Know your (cyber) enemy
Technology advancements have changed the way financial services operate, but they have also ushered in new challenges and threats.
What are the risks, how big are they and what is the impact? Eg. Data theft versus system shut downs – which has a greater economic threat?
When financial services are attacked…
Cyber criminals have exposed vulnerabilities of financial institutions to disturbing effect. Is it more effective for banks to counter cyber risks on their own, or collectively as an industry? Would it help to have a central regulator for bank cyber security? When assessing counterparty risks, how much weightage is placed on their cyber security controls?
Responding to the cyber challenge – how financial services can best prepare
The establishment of regulatory controls and standards can only go so far, and the industry itself need to do much more to improve the situation – getting the basics right in a legacy environment, sharing best practices, building a security-based culture etc…
Looking ahead: Anticipating paradigm shifts
How much closer are we to creating ‘unhackable’ systems? Can quantum computing or other technologies present a cost-efficient solution?
By signing up to this webinar you agree to be contacted (by email) by the hosts Euromoney & Global Capital, as well as the sponsor Standard Chartered.
On Monday, 5 December, Euroclear Bank Settlement went live on the Taskize platform. Taskize is a new service that will help the financial services industry make work flow by enabling clients, colleagues and counterparties to address manual interventions efficiently, intelligently and securely.
In this 30-minute webinar, Luigi Bearzatto, Euroclear, joins Taskize Limited's John O'Hara and Philip Slavin to provide more detail on Taskize, its features, and the Euroclear-related offer that can be made available to you.
This session will address certain issues arising from Title VII of Dodd-Frank and the ongoing regulation of the derivatives markets in the U.S. and elsewhere. We will cover:
•the “common approach” of the US and the EU with respect to central counterparties;
•the prudential regulators’ and CFTC’s final margin rules for uncleared swaps;
•the CFTC, SEC and prudential regulator rules and guidance relating to the cross-border application of the requirements of Title VII of Dodd-Frank, including for margin.
•the challenges that lie ahead in relation to cross-border harmonisation.
A presentation of the '2015 Structured Product Annual Performance Review', compiled by StructuredProductReview.com and presented by Lowes Structured Investment Centre.
The Review represents the most comprehensive data and analysis of structured product performance ever undertaken in the UK, covering all IFA distributed products to have matured in 2015, broken down by product and payoff type. 5-year data will also be presented, for a long term perspective of the sector and product performance.
The Review provides factual data / empirical evidence for advisers and investors, that will be invaluable in assessing the efficacy and value of structured products and their performance ... and will highlight the exceptionally strong performance of the sector's products, across the piste, for all product types and risk/return categories, including Structured Deposits, Capital Protected and Capital-at-Risk Products.
An inaugural 'Spot the Stars' section will also be used to help demonstrate the diversity of providers, counterparties, product offerings and risk/return propositions offered by the sector.
BCBS 239 requires globally and domestically systemically important banks to aggregate, govern, and share timely, trusted, and accurate data to manage credit, operational, market, and liquidity risk above traditional business and geographic silos. Though the deadline past back in January 1, 2016, firms are still struggling with:
- Data integration and aggregation of data across legacy systems
- Managing data quality errors from upstream systems and mid-stream processes
- Identifying unique and related counterparties and legal entities for risk exposure analysis
- Gaining access to technical metadata to understand end to end data lineage for regulators
- Managing and publishing common business definitions of data used to manage risk
These are just a view of the 14 principles set forth in BCBS 239. Join Peter Ku, Head of Financial Services Industry Consulting to understand how Informatica's platform is used to address BCBS 239, CCAR, and more.
Banks and financial institutions have faced a spate of risk-related regulations since the financial crisis of 2008. Basel II, the regulatory requirement for estimating capital adequacy during the financial crisis, was replaced by Basel III, which added requirements around counterparty risk and market risk as well new regulations for measuring liquidity risk. More recently, US regulators initiated capital adequacy measurements under stress conditions as part of the Dodd-Frank Act Stress test (DFAST), and the same philosophy is being adopted by other jurisdictions in Europe and Asia.
In this webinar, IIA VP and Research Director Daniel Magestro is joined by Ravi Chari, a Director of Regulatory Risk Management at SAS Institute, to discuss how to leverage existing investments in data and risk to create an infrastructure for effective risk reporting. They review criteria for successful compliance with these regulations, including the creation of an appropriate risk data infrastructure and subsequent management of data from a governance and quality perspective.
Pension funds may have been granted a temporary exemption from the central clearing aspects of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) - an exemption that is likely to be extended - however, there are significant implications they need to start thinking about now. Asset protection is a key concern in a centrally cleared environment with the industry exploring various segregation models to increase asset safety and reduce counterparty risk. Coupled with the growing concern for liquidity availability EMIR is proving to be more challenging than initially thought. Let us guide you through these issues to help ensure you’re prepared and have the optimal solutions in place.Read more >
Pending and proposed regulatory reforms are likely to significantly impact future developments within the securities finance industry. To better understand the changing environment and how you can best prepare, please join State Street on 8 May for an informative dialogue where we’ll answer questions such as:
• What are the relevant provisions for lending agents and borrower counterparties?
• How might regulatory reform change the industry landscape?
• What impact, if any, do these changes mean for asset owners and asset managers that wish to lend their securities in the future? What are the possible new opportunities and benefits to the lending industry?
• As new structures emerge, what should beneficial owners consider?
• Besides reducing market and systemic risk, what other gains are regulators expecting to achieve from new regulations?
Glenn Horner, CFA, FRM
Managing Director, Regulatory Affairs
State Street Securities Finance
Senior Managing Director, Head of Relationship Management, EMEA
State Street Securities Finance
Senior Managing Director, Head of Global Trading
State Street Securities Finance
Chief Executive Officer
International Securities Lending Association (ISLA)
Vice President, Asset Owner Solutions, EMEA
State Street Global Services
A panel from the IFLR European Capital Markets Forum on April 9 at the Waldorf in London.
• Prime Collateralised Securities initiative - lessons from first issuances
• Opportunities to revive the CMBS market?
• Dodd-Frank and its impact on commodity pools
• Solvency II interpretation
• Increase in fixed rate deals and deals structured without need for swap counterparty
• Developments: covered bonds and project bonds
Jerry Marlatt, senior counsel, Morrison & Foerster (chair)
Brad Duncan, director and deputy general counsel, Citigroup
Steven Gandy, managing director and head of securitisation, Santander Global Banking & Markets
For more information and coverage of the event, please visit www.iflr.com/ecm2013
The Federal Reserve recently issued proposed rules under §§ 165 and 166 of the Dodd- Frank Act that would establish enhanced prudential standards for certain foreign banking organization’s branches in the United States. The proposed rules will likely require fundamental changes in the way that many foreign banks do business in the U.S., including new requirements that many foreign banks structure their U.S. operations through U.S. intermediate holding companies and meet enhanced capital and liquidity standards, detailed corporate governance, risk management mandates, and single counterparty credit limits.
Please join Alma Angotti, Jay Perlman, and Jim Vint of Navigant and Jeremy Newell of law firm WilmerHale as they address these issues and your questions in a free, one-hour webcast.
In the aftermath of the 2008 financial market meltdown, authorities re-examined whether global trading of over-the-counter derivatives, now sized at $650 trillion, had contributed to volatility, excess leverage and systematic risk. As a result, lawmakers passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, in hopes of lowering the probability of problems in the future. A cornerstone of this Act is the central clearing and trade execution mandate. As this massive mandate is being implemented for the first time ever, countless companies and financial institutions are becoming acutely aware of the importance of the end-user exception to their hedging and risk management programs.
In this timely and informative webinar hosted by FTI Consulting, legal, compliance and risk management experts will provide critical information about (1) Overview of CFTC swaps end-user rule as part of Dodd-Frank implementation; (2) Costs of having to comply with new swaps clearing rules unless an exemption under CFTC Rule 39.6 is received; (3) Who qualifies for the CFTC Rule 39.6 end-user exemption; (4) How to meet tests that demonstrate that swaps are being used to mitigate commercial risk; (5) Role of the board and risk management committee in seeking an end-user exemption; (6) Prudent risk management “must haves” beyond full compliance with the end-user exemption rule; (7) What to expect when transacting with a financial entity counterparty; (8) Correcting swap end-user deficiencies; (9) What to expect from a regulatory audit; and (10) Best practices for end-users to prepare their annual information filing.
Who Should Attend:
•Chief Financial Officers and Treasurers
•Bank lenders •Investors in companies that hedge
•Internal and external auditors
On November 3, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rules implementing what the Commission described as a “whistleblower program to reward individuals who provide the agency with high-quality tips that lead to successful enforcement actions. The rules reflect the Commission’s attempt to implement the new whistleblower laws set forth in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act while accommodating a host of competing policy interests. Among the tricky issues facing the SEC are the conflicts between the economic interests of employees who possess information that might result in a successful enforcement action and the government’s interest in encouraging robust internal controls supported by employee reporting; and the inherent conflict between corporate interest in confidentiality, including confidentiality in business relationships, and the need to self report possible internal misconduct and the misconduct of commercial counterparties.
This webcast will examine the SEC’s proposed new whistleblower rules and their implications for internal controls and compliance programs, investigations, self-reporting incentives and employer/employee relations, including executive compensation and employee reporting responsibilities.
Please join Byron Egan and Jeffrey M. Sone, partners with the Jackson Walker L.L.P. law firm in Dallas, and Gary Kleinrichert of FTI Consulting in Chicago as they address these issues and your questions.
The iron ore derivative contract operates as an over-the-counter, cash-settled agreement designed to enable better price risk management for users and traders and eliminate counterparty risk, thus managing financial exposure. A practical guide for market participants.Read more >