When Insiders Go Rogue: Tactics for Monitoring and Containing Breaches

A lot of organizations are trying to implement some kind of segmentation in their data centers. Different approaches to segmentation deployment have exposed many challenges. During this talk approach to segmentation at the edge will be considered. When implementing segmentation at the edge disruption to existing infrastructure is minimal and performance of the network is improved. Attendees will learn about this new software defined segmentation at the edge approach benefits.

The Security Operations Center was born from its parent, the Network Operations Center, inheriting its philosophy, structure, methodologies and even roles. The SOC, of course, has been evolving over the last few years but only by updating old concepts, technologies, processes and roles coming from the NOC.

In 2020 is when we're going to start the SOC Revolution, being independent from its parent, creating its own model (new roles, new technology and new processes), being proactive instead of reactive, risk and threat-based and becoming even more strategic: a business loss safeguard and growth enabler for all the organizations globally.

With the proliferation of the Internet of Things, IoT devices are often added into enterprise environments without due consideration for the security and privacy risks they pose to the business. Oftentimes, IT security teams do not have full visibility into how many IoT devices are connected to the network. This creates security gaps, as IoT devices are notoriously vulnerable to hacks and attacks.

Join this interactive panel experts to learn about how enterprises can enhance endpoint, and therefore IoT security.

Attendees will learn more about:
- IoT and today's enterprise
- What's on your network? How do you evaluate IoT devices?
- Why visibility is key
- Controlling access to your IoT environment
- Vendor risk and holding vendors accountable for their IoT equipment
- Areas for automation and where to reduce your IT security team's involvement
- Patching and upgrading
- Expert recommendations for enhancing IoT security

Speakers:
Peter Wood, Partner, Naturally Cyber LLP (Moderator)
Terence Jackson, CISO, Thycotic
Brian Russell, IoT Working Group Co-Chair, Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)
Kalani Enos, Founder & CEO, KEnos Technologies LLC
Alexandre Blanc, Director of Security, Adaware (an Avanquest company)

Many businesses have put tremendous effort in automating processes and
security controls that protect their data. However, in the case of a disaster, your business continuity plan (BCP) likely relies on manual processes that may open a side door to threat actors and leave your business and data more vulnerable than before.

Learn the things you should be considering as part of your BCP to help keep your data protected.

In today’s business landscape it is important to take a proactive approach to security rather than a reactive approach. Join leading security experts as they discuss the safest ways to protect your organisation in 2019 and beyond.

Join this Q&A panel to learn more about:

- Key organisational benefits to practising proactive security
- Technologies powering security
- Best practices and recommendations for a more secure organization

Speakers:
Roselle Safran, President, Rosint Labs (Moderator)
Sean Webb, Information Security Manager, Patriot One Technologies Inc.
Michelle McLean, Vice President of Product Marketing, StackRox
Michelle Drolet, CEO & Co-Founder, Towerwall
Chris Calvert, VP of Product Strategy, Respond Software

The rapid rise of breach response capability as an absolute necessity has GDPR to thank/blame. But what should have been an extension of every organisation's existing incident response / disaster recovery program, is now an excuse to reach into your pockets. Like everything in security, breach response is not complicated - or even difficult in most cases - it just has to be 'appropriate'.

In this webinar you will learn that:
-Breach response is not a product, and it's certainly not a technology, it's a collection of procedures;
-If you don't have decent incident response, breach response is pointless;
-Most organisations trying to sell you breach response out of the gate are doing you no favours
-Asking the right questions is your responsibility!

Waterfall is based on the concept of sequential software development—from conception to ongoing maintenance—where each of the many steps flowed logically into the next.

Join this webinar presentation to learn:
- Why DevOps cannot effectively work in waterfall
- How to use DevOps tools to optimize processes in either development or operations through automation

We will also discuss what is needed to support full DevOps optimization and create a Secure Agile Development process.

The emerging DataOps is not Just DevOps for Data. According to Gartner, DataOps is a collaborative data management practice focused on improving the communication, integration and automation of data flows between data managers and consumers across an organization.

The goal of DataOps is to create predictable delivery and change management of data, data models and related artifacts. DataOps uses technology to automate data delivery with the appropriate levels of security, quality and metadata to improve the use and value of data in a dynamic environment.

This session will discuss how to add Security in DataOps and DevOps.

On January 1st 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) is going into effect. Are you familiar with the CCPA's privacy requirements? Is your organization ready for the most far-reaching data privacy regulation in the U.S. to date? 
Join this panel of privacy experts for an interactive Q&A session to learn more about how CCPA will impact your organization, as well as dive into the main differences between CCPA and GDPR.
- The CCPA privacy requirements- CCPA checklist beyond deadline day
- Data mapping: how and why it is important for CCPA and GDPR
- Data Subject Access Requests 
- Other key similarities and differences between GDPR vs. CCPA
- The future of privacy and compliance in 2020 and beyond

Speakers:
- Guy Cohen, Strategy and Policy Lead, Privitar
- Lisa Hawke, VP Security and Compliance, Everlaw
- Joanne Furtsch, Director, Deputy Data Governance Officer, TrustArc
- Laura Koulet, Vice President, Head of Legal & Privacy, Tapad

The Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework share the common goal of enhancing data security. This session maps PCI DSS to the NIST Framework and discuss how to align security efforts to meet objectives in both PCI DSS and the NIST Framework.

PCI DSS is focused on the unique security threats and risks present in the payments industry

The NIST Framework provides an overarching security and risk-management structure with security Functions, Categories, and Subcategories of actions. These Subcategories reference globally recognized standards for cybersecurity.

Both PCI DSS and the NIST Framework are solid security approaches that address common security goals and principles as relevant to specific risks.

We will discuss how the NIST Framework identifies general security outcomes and activities, and how PCI DSS provides specific direction and guidance on how to meet security outcomes for payment environments.

This session will also discuss the interesting attribute based access control (ABAC) as a logical access control methodology where authorization to perform a set of operations is determined by evaluating attributes associated with the subject, object, requested operations, and, in some cases, environment conditions against policy, rules, or relationships that describe the allowable operations for a given set of attributes. This session also provides considerations for using ABAC to improve information sharing within organizations and between organizations while maintaining control of that information.

Too often, Information Security means technical point solutions. This approach leaves enterprises exposed and management and customers disillusioned.

Join us to learn:

- Why security programs remain on the margins of business adoption in spite of heightened threats and acknowledged need
- Why security by technology alone is a dead end
- The secret sauce for a vibrant, effective information security program

The enterprise cybersecurity landscape is dramatically expanding in scale and complexity, and cyberattacks are growing in magnitude and impact as digital transformation increases on a global scale. From phishing scams, to ransomware attacks, to malicious breaches from state actors, the potential threat to your business is huge. According to the Ponemon Institute, the average per breach cost to a company in 2018 was estimated at $3.86 million, an increase of 6.4 percent over the previous year.

Even though cybersecurity presents a challenge to the enterprise, you are not helpless against the bad actors who seek to cause real and costly damage to your business. A proactive, company-wide, integrated digital security strategy that addresses cybersecurity threats at all levels of your business will provide you with both the offensive and defensive capabilities you need to handle whatever comes your way. Earn 1 CPE credit by attending this educational and interactive panel webinar. Our experts will discuss why fortifying your cybersecurity strategy should be a critical priority and highlight some best practices that you can employ to stay ahead of evolving threats, including how to;

- Understand the changing cyberattack landscape,
- Create a company-wide cybersecurity task force,
- Evaluate your security budget against your threat level,
- Fortify your cybersecurity defense with systems hardening, adaptive authentication, and endpoint protection.

As organizations evaluate their de-identification and data minimization practices to satisfy an expanding landscape of regulatory obligations there are a number of factors to consider. Various technologies will be considered as part of a data-centric security strategy for de-identifying and securing sensitive information such as statistical tools, cryptographic solutions, suppression, pseudonymization, generalization, and randomization. Further, we will examine the capability of these technologies to preserve business utility within a Zero Trust data security model.

Listen to this session and you will take away:

• An understanding of the definition of de-identification as it relates to international and industry privacy regulations, including the difference between pseudonymization and anonymization
• A strategy for balancing privacy and security concerns with business needs, such as evaluating and prioritizing risk
• How various methods of de-identification can help meet the privacy requirements of applicable compliance obligations

Companies today are increasingly aware of their privacy compliance obligations, including the emerging requirements from recent regulations like GDPR and California's CCPA. Most companies that invest in a privacy compliance uplift spend time on policy revisions, data subject rights tooling, training, and data discovery. But after the first rush of compliance activities, the challenges of privacy operations evolve:

- How do you get beyond point in time compliance into managing repeatable processes?
- What existing teams and operations should privacy leverage right away, and how should this change over time?
- How do you prioritize updates to your data subject rights tooling, whether you've custom built or outsourced?
- How do you avoid privacy fatigue?

This webinar will cover common areas where privacy compliance can "get stuck," and discuss ways to successfully operationalize a growing privacy program at the speed of business.

Presenter Info: Adrienne Allen, Head of Security GRC and Privacy, Coinbase

US Cyber Command has undergone a significant shift in strategies away from defense and deterrence to engagement and forward disruption. We’ll discuss whether offensive cyber actions deter or invite retaliatory attacks, impacts to private industry (both positive and negative), and whether enterprise security offices should take offensive measures and if so – how far should we go?