How to Stop Rubber-Stamping User Access Reviews within Regulated Applications

Presented by

Jason Gzym, IGA & Compliance Expert | VP of Solutions Eng. & Customer Advisory at Pathlock

About this talk

Most User Access Reviews (UARs), especially in SOX-scope applications and other regulated environments like SAP, Oracle, and Workday, are performed to meet compliance requirements — not because they drive meaningful security outcomes. They’re repetitive, rubber-stamped, and void of risk context. This session will explore how to bring real value into the UAR process. Instead of treating it like a checkbox exercise, we’ll show how to align reviews with business risk, improve review accuracy, and give reviewers the context they need to make better decisions — all without overloading them. You’ll learn how to: - Improve the efficiency of UARs by focusing reviews on high-risk access - Close the gap between compliance and security with smarter, risk-informed decisions - Simplify the reviewer experience to reduce friction and avoid rubber-stamping If you’ve ever felt like your user access review process didn't lead to an improved security posture, this session will provide key lessons on meeting that objective.
Executive IT Forums

Executive IT Forums

54774 subscribers89 talks
Empowering the GRC Community
The IT GRC Forum produces online events and provides professional networking facilities and market intelligence to Governance, Risk Management and Compliance professionals.
Related topics